|
 |
 |
等级： 论坛游侠
贴子：229
PR：550
产通币：0
注册：2007/12/30 |
|
| 第 1 楼 |
|
 美国国际贸易委员会（USITC）对中国电子成像设备和橡胶树脂启动337调查 |
【产通社，6月26日讯】6月20日以来的一周内，美国国际贸易委员会（USITC）先后在橡胶树脂及制造方法（certain rubber resins and processes for manufacturing same），以及电子成像设备领域，主要针对中国企业发起“337调查”，以确定是否存在专利侵权行为。
6月20日，USITC决定对部分橡胶树脂及制造方法启动337调查，涉案产品是人造橡胶树脂，包括用于轮胎制造的增粘剂。该调查缘于圣莱科特国际集团（SI Group）5月21日向美国USITC提出的申请，指控美国进口及美国国内市场销售的部分橡胶树脂，包括“增粘剂”侵犯了其商业秘密，要求启动337调查，并发布排除令和禁止令。美国ITC最终确定下列企业作为本案的强制应诉方：
. 美国RedAvenue化学公司
. Thomas R. Crumlish公司
. Precision Measurement International LLC of Westland公司
. 中国华齐（张家港）化工有限公司（Sino Legend (Zhangjiagang) Chemical Co., Ltd., of China）
. 国骏集团（英国）有限公司（Sino Legend Holding Group, Inc., of the British Virgin Islands）
. 香港国骏集团有限公司（Sino Legend Holding Group Limited of Hong Kong）
. Red Avenue Chemical Co. Ltd. of the British Virgin Islands
. 加拿大Ning Zhang公司
. 上海伦赛国际贸易公司（Shanghai Lunsai International Trading Company of China）
6月25日，USITC决定对中国大陆及台湾多家企业生产的电子成像设备发起“337调查”，以确定是否存在专利侵权行为。本次调查缘起5月23日美国新罕布什尔州的闪点技术公司（FlashPoint Technology, Inc.）向美国USITC提出的申请，指控美国进口及在美国市场销售的上述涉案产品侵犯了该公司专利，要求启动“337调查”，并发布排除令和禁止进口令。美国ITC最终确定下列企业作为本案的强制应诉方：
. 台湾宏达国际电子股份有限公司 （HTC Corporation of Taiwan）
. 宏达电美国公司 （HTC America, Inc., of Bellevue, WA）
. 韩国Pantech公司 （Pantech Co., Ltd., of Republic of Korea）
. Pantech无线公司 （Pantech Wireless Inc. of Atlanta, GA）
. 华为技术有限公司 （Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., of China）
. 华为美国子公司 （FutureWei Technologies, Inc., d/b/a Huawei Technologies (USA), of Plano, TX）
. 中兴通讯股份有限公司 （ZTE Corporation of China）
. 中兴通讯美国公司 （ZTE (USA) Inc. of Richardson, TX.）
一月前的5月18日，USITC对全球45家公司发起“337调查”，以确定这些公司在生产带有可伸缩USB连接器（retractable USB connector）的电子设备时是否存在专利侵权行为，调查产品主要是照相机、便携摄像机、数码录音机、MP3播放器、无线调制解调器和闪存驱动器等带有可伸缩USB连接器的电子设备，被调查企业包括多家亚洲知名电子设备生产商，如中国华为技术有限公司、日本奥林巴斯、日本松下、日本东芝和韩国三星等。
美国所谓“337调查”最早得名于《1930年美国关税法》第37条款，后经历数次重大修订。根据该条款，美国国际贸易委员会有权调查有关专利和注册商标侵权的申诉，此外也开展涉及盗用商业机密、商品包装侵权、仿制和虚假广告等内容的调查。
根据有关程序，美国国际贸易委员会在启动“37调查”后，该机构必须在４５日内确定终裁的目标时间，并尽快完成调查，通常案件需要在一年内作出裁决。如果涉案企业被裁定违反了第37条款，美国国际贸易委员会将发布相关产品的排除令和禁止进口令，这意味着涉案产品将彻底丧失进入美国市场的资格。
今年以来，美国对中国产品多次发起“双反”调查和“37调查”，贸易保护主义明显升温。除个别产业免遭制裁之外，几乎所有受调查的产品都被施以贸易制裁。（环球电子导报）
*******************************
June 25, 2012
News Release 12-071
Inv. No. 337-TA-850
Contact: Peg O'Laughlin, 202-205-1819
USITC INSTITUTES SECTION 337 INVESTIGATION ON CERTAIN ELECTRONIC IMAGING DEVICES
The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has voted to institute an investigation of certain electronic imaging devices. The products at issue in this investigation are mobile phones, tablet computers, and other devices having imaging capabilities.
The investigation is based on a complaint filed by FlashPoint Technology, Inc. of Peterborough, NH, on May 23, 2012. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 in the importation into the United States and sale of certain electronic imaging devices that infringe patents asserted by complainant. The complainant requests that the USITC issue an exclusion order and cease and desist orders.
The USITC has identified the following as respondents in this investigation:
HTC Corporation of Taiwan;
HTC America, Inc., of Bellevue, WA;
Pantech Co., Ltd., of Republic of Korea;
Pantech Wireless Inc. of Atlanta, GA;
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., of China;
FutureWei Technologies, Inc., d/b/a Huawei Technologies (USA), of Plano, TX;
ZTE Corporation of China;
ZTE (USA) Inc. of Richardson, TX.
By instituting this investigation (337-TA-850), the USITC has not yet made any decision on the merits of the case. The USITC's Chief Administrative Law Judge will assign the case to one of the USITC's six administrative law judges (ALJ), who will schedule and hold an evidentiary hearing. The ALJ will make an initial determination as to whether there is a violation of section 337; that initial determination is subject to review by the Commission.
The USITC will make a final determination in the investigation at the earliest practicable time. Within 45 days after institution of the investigation, the USITC will set a target date for completing the investigation. USITC remedial orders in section 337 cases are effective when issued and become final 60 days after issuance unless disapproved for policy reasons by the U.S. Trade Representative within that 60-day period.
*******************************
June 20, 2012
News Release 12-070
Inv. No. 337-TA-849
Contact: Peg O'Laughlin, 202-205-1819
USITC INSTITUTES SECTION 337 INVESTIGATION ON CERTAIN RUBBER RESINS AND PROCESSES FOR MANUFACTURING SAME
The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has voted to institute an investigation of certain rubber resins and processes for manufacturing same. The products at issue in this investigation are synthetic rubber resins, including tackifiers used in the manufacture of tires.
The investigation is based on a complaint filed by SI Group, Inc., of Schenectady, NY, on May 21, 2012. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 in the misappropriation of trade secrets asserted by SI Group, Inc., and the importation into the United States and sale of certain rubber resins, including "tackifier" ("tackifiers") made using trade secrets asserted by SI Group, Inc. The complainants request that the USITC issue an exclusion order and a cease and desist order.
The USITC has identified the following as respondents in this investigation:
RedAvenue Chemical Corp. of America of Rochester, NY;
Thomas R. Crumlish, Jr., of Rochester, NY;
Precision Measurement International LLC of Westland, MI;
Sino Legend (Zhangjiagang) Chemical Co., Ltd., of China;
Sino Legend Holding Group, Inc., of the British Virgin Islands;
Sino Legend Holding Group Limited of Hong Kong;
HongKong Sino Legend Group Ltd. of Hong Kong;
Red Avenue Chemical Co. Ltd. of the British Virgin Islands;
Ning Zhang of Canada;
Quanhai Yang of of China; and
Shanghai Lunsai International Trading Company of China.
By instituting this investigation (337-TA-849), the USITC has not yet made any decision on the merits of the case. The USITC's Chief Administrative Law Judge will assign the case to one of the USITC's six administrative law judges (ALJ), who will schedule and hold an evidentiary hearing. The ALJ will make an initial determination as to whether there is a violation of section 337; that initial determination is subject to review by the Commission.
The USITC will make a final determination in the investigation at the earliest practicable time. Within 45 days after institution of the investigation, the USITC will set a target date for completing the investigation. USITC remedial orders in section 337 cases are effective when issued and become final 60 days after issuance unless disapproved for policy reasons by the U.S. Trade Representative within that 60-day period. |
|  |
| 产品通俱乐部__品牌推广、b2b社群、公关企划、商业展览、科技翻译 |
|
|
还没呢
[
2012-6-26 15:39
